Pravin Kalaiselvan, owner of a travel company, was in for a shock on March 25, two days after the lockdown first began, when his father allegedly received a call from a collection agent from Cashbean, a payday loan app, claiming that his son was a defaulter.
Kalaiselvan had borrowed Rs 15,000 from the loan app for a week to pay for his mother’s sudden illness. “I had a temporary liquidity issue and had to pick up a short-term loan, on the due date I forgot to pay up. So, the loan company hacked into my phone and secured my father’s contact to harass him,” he said.
Cashbean, in response to ET’s queries said that the messages and notices sent were without the knowledge of the company and “stringent measures” were taken against the collection agent.
“The Code of Conduct clearly defines the Company’s stand and we would like to confirm that the alleged notice and messages, as shared, were sent without the knowledge and/or any authorization of or on behalf of the Company. As soon as we received the notice from RBI, the company took stringent measures against the outsourced employee,” spokesperson from CashBean which is a part of P C Financial Services, said.
Kalaiselvan, however, is not alone. Hundreds of customers have taken to social media to complain of intimidation and harassment by collection agents of online loan applications.
They claim that cyber-bullying techniques such as naming and shaming, intimidation using fake legal notices and repeated ‘harassment’ calls are being made by some companies seeking missed dues on short-term loans availed by customers during the coronavirus pandemic.
A message sent to one such ‘defaulter’ reads: “We have started calling your 30 person-friend-relatives and family members asking them why you are overdue and we have already allotted maximum time, so don’t blame us for any harm to that reputation.”
Separately, a fake document created by one such lender claims that non-payment of dues would lead to probes by the CBI and RBI. Similarly, mails forged in the name of the central bank, seen by ET, claim that an RBI team from financial supervision tried to reach the borrower but owing to unavailability of the customer, late repayment charges would be levied.
The pandemic-induced economic slowdown has triggered mass-defaults among several sections of customers in both urban and rural demographics, making operations of several digital lenders unviable. This has caused some lenders to go aggressive on their collection strategies, irking some customers while distressing others.
After reviewing screenshots of such WhatsApp messages shared by customers, app reviews on Google Playstore and Twitter threads, ET has sent detailed questionnaires to a dozen such companies allegedly resorting to intimidation techniques seeking repayment. These include Cashbean, Loanfront, Mad-Elephant, Cashe, mPokket, Cahsbus, CashMama, Timely Cash, Robocash, Kissht, LoanTime and UCash.
As per an industry source, the number of such companies could be higher than 50, but ET could not independently verify all of them.
Responding to ET’s queries, some of these lenders denied claims of securing remote access to customers’ contact lists without permission. They said that calls may have been placed only to references provided by customers themselves during the signing up process.
“In the current situation, we have extended all possible benefits to our customers…and only where we are unable to reach them, we reach out to the reference provided to us during the sanctioning of the loan and request the references to share the information with the end user,” Robocash said, responding to ET’s query.
Similarly, loan app Kissht said that it has offered a moratorium to 1.5 lakh customers. “The calling has been largely around reminders, moratorium, and practices to sail through tough times. We don’t have access to the customer contact books, nor do we engage with calling other than the provided references,” said a Kissht spokesperson.
Ketal Patel, MD and CEO of Cashe, said that bounce rates on loans had increased from 10% earlier to over 30-40% during the lockdown weeks of the pandemic. “We don’t access contact lists of customers or use any intimidation techniques. Moratorium may have been denied only for those who had already defaulted prior to RBI’s announcement.”
Spokespersons from Loanfront and mPokket also claimed that the companies haven’t knowingly breached any privacy violation or been rude to customers.
“‘Naming and shaming’” is absolutely unacceptable and strictly prohibited & not practiced at all. LoanFront has a very strict “Code of Conduct” for the collection purposes and at no point of time any rude and unfair collections are tolerated…and if any agent is found not following the “Code of Conduct” will have to go through strict disciplinary action,” said Gowrinath Raghava, Founder & CEO of Capfront Technologies of which Loanfront is a part.
An mPokket spokesperson meanwhile said that it only resorts to sending legal notices to customers after prolonged efforts to connect with them fails. “Like all lending institutions, our company too has a process to remind customers of outstanding dues… Post a substantial number of reminders, as per govt guidelines, we send a legal notice to our users, in cases where dues are pending for a substantial amount of time… However, at no point have we harassed or maligned our customer’s reputation on social platforms.”
The issue has not gone unnoticed within the digital lending industry. Digital Lenders Association of India (DLAI), an industry body of over 80 digital lenders, has recently redrafted its ‘code of conduct’ for members to include ethical collection practices.
A DLAI spokesperson, on the condition of anonymity, said that the redrafting was done following incidents of customer harassment coming to light, as high default rates triggered by the coronavirus pandemic put the financials of several smaller NBFCs under stress.
“The member will ensure that there is no undue harassment or intimidation (physical or verbal) of customers, including practices such as calling (or threatening to call) any family member of the customer or any person associated with the customer,” reads a newly introduced section of the DLAI code of conduct.
Leave a Reply